AN ASSESSMENT OF THE IMPACT OF MERGERS AND ACQUISITION IN THE NIGERIAN BANKING INDUSTRY
CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
1.1 BACKGROUND
The modern trend all over
the world has made mergers and acquisition one of the acceptable strategy for
expansion due to the dynamism and complexities within the business environment.
This was resulted from the realization that success in business can in most
cases be efficiently achieved through free enterprises. In a country like Nigeria where the economy
is in a recessionary and depression state, the most important task of
management is to adopt a strategy for survival and growth. Once this is
achieved, the need to strengthen its position for growth and expansion ensure
one of the strategies for survival and growth in such a depressed economy like
Nigeria is merger and acquisition. It is in line with this thinking that this
was research was conducted.
On a general note, the
concept of merger and acquisition is basically at a very young age in Nigerian
economy in general and more especially the banking sector. It was on July 6th
2004 that the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) announced major policy that bring
merger and acquisition issue to forefront of discussion. The CBN decided to
increase the minimum net shareholders’ fund (net capital) to N25 billion up from N1 billion (which was just raised to N2 billion in January, 2004) with December 31st 2005 as the
deadline of compliance. However, recent
developments in the industry have shown that increasing the capital base is not
the only magic wand that will solve the problem of Nigerian banking sector. We
have seen so-called big banks almost crashing because of irresponsible and
reckless management.
1.2 STATEMENT
OF RESEARCH PROBLEM
It is argued theoretically
that the growth of a firm could be achieved through the application of merger
and acquisition strategy. The important questions the researcher is now faced
with are:
i)
What are the reasons for success and failure of merger and
acquisition?
ii)
What are the causes of merger and acquisition?
iii)
Does the law have anything to do with it?
iv)
What are the problems faced during and after merger and
finally, how are the employees affected?
The answer to these
questions therefore becomes the main concern of the researcher. This study
analyzes the pre and post operation result of the banks that experienced merger
and acquisition in Nigeria.
1.3 OBJECTIVES
OF THE STUDY
The general objectives are
to examine mergers and acquisition in the Nigeria banking industry, other
objectives of the study include:
i)
To assess the impact of mergers and acquisition in the
banking industry whether beneficial or otherwise.
ii)
To know whether mergers and acquisition in the industry will
be able to achieve the much needed stability in the banking sectors.
iii)
To offer or give some useful recommendation toward solving
the identified problems.
iv)
To examine whether the merger and acquisition contribute to
improving the efficiency and effectiveness of the effective banks.
1.4 HYPOTHESIS
For the purpose of this
study, the following hypothesis was formulated:
HO: Mergers and acquisition have no impact on
the performance of the banking sector.
H1: Mergers and acquisition have impact on
the performance of the banking
sector.
1.5 SIGNIFICANCE
OF THE STUDY
Under the currently
depressed Nigerian economy, survival of organization has become an important
consideration. Hence, it is pertinent for corporate entities to always give the
national economy and optimum consideration before making important investment
proposals. Mergers and acquisition was therefore examined as a means of
attaining operational efficiency, corporate growth and the general improvement
in the national economy. The study seeks to contribute to the available
literature and knowledge on the issues of mergers and acquisition in Nigeria.
The study will also serve as a scholarly contribution towards assessing the
performance of organization before and after the merger. Hopefully, students’
future researchers in this area will find the outcome very useful.
1.6 SCOPE
OF THE STUDY
This study will strictly be
on mergers and acquisition in the Nigerian banks and it intended to assess the
impact of mergers and acquisition in the banking industry. The study is
restricted to the merger and acquisition of United Bank for Africa Plc (UBA) as
a case study.
1.7 LIMITATION
OF THE STUDY
- A good research work
requires a lot of work to be done, but there are some problems that are likely
to hinder the research from carrying out proper research.
- Time factor is one
hindrance, as there is limited time available to the researcher.
- Collection of data from
the company is another problem as most organizations see some information as
highly confidential which they are not ready to supply.
- People answering the
question may waste your time, some even give you wrong or misleading answers to
the questions you ask. However, this research will try to cover as much as
possible, the topic at hand and overcome these problems.
1.8 DEFINITION
OF TERMS
i)
Merger: This is the joining of two separate companies to form
single company while the other company ceases to exist.
ii)
Acquisition: Is the purchase of whole or partial transfer of
control of the assets, liabilities, employees, management, technical
relationship and expertise of one corporation to another.
iii)
Stability: Is the state of things being uncharged that is not
likely to give way or overturn or something that does not change within a range
of time.
iv)
Trends: Means the general direction in which something is
developing changing or heading towards.
v)
Conglomerate: A firm that deals in many different unrelated
products.
vi)
Diversification: This occurs when a company activity seeks to
absorb new products and/or new market where it was no previous market presence.
vii)
Ailing: To cause problems for major banks.
viii)
Banking Industry: The companies engaged in the business of
offering financial services of keeping money for individuals or companies,
exchange currencies, make loans and offer other financial services.
CHAPTER TWO
LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1 INTRODUCTION
This chapter reviewed the
existing literature in the field of merger and acquisition the conceptual
framework of other studies will also be conceptualized. Mergers and
acquisition, be it in any sector of an economy, is aimed at strengthen the
performance and survival chance of the merging firms. Therefore, mergers and
acquisition in the Nigerian banking industry is highly inevitable if the
financial sector need to be sanitizing for the purposes of building confidence
in the mind of the major player of the sector. Mergers and acquisition being a
global phenomena attracted numerous studies and debates nationally or
internationally to achieve business objectives.
2.2 THE
CONCEPTS OF MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS
The spate of mergers and
acquisition activities can be traced back to the period around 1855-1905 in the
USA. However, the first merger exercises in Nigeria were witnessed in 1982,
with the approval of mergers of United Nigeria Insurance Company Limited and
United Nigeria Life Insurance Company Limited. Since 1990s, there have been mergers
and acquisition in several sectors of the Nigerian economy some of the major
ones are stated below are Investment Banking and Trust Company Limited (IBTC)
acted as financial advisers in many of these mergers transactions that is
acquisition of 7s of Guarantee Trust Merchants Ltd (now Union Merchant Bank
Ltd) by Union Bank of Nigeria Plc in 1995. In 1996, acquisition of 70% of
Meridian Equity Bank of Nigeria Ltd (now Equity Bank of Nigeria Ltd) by
Nigerian Intercontinental Merchant Bank Ltd (now Intercontinental Bank Plc) and
also the acquisition of 100% of Nigeria Arab Bank Plc (now Assurance Bank Plc)
by National Insurance Corporation of Nigeria in 1997 etc. (SEC, 2003).
Kantudu (2005) viewed merger
as a combination of two or more companies in which all but one of the combining
companies ceases to exist and the surviving company continues in operation in
its original name. From the legal point
of view, Section 590 of the companies and Allied Matters Decree (CAMD) of 1990
stipulate that mergers have been designed as “any amalgamation of the
undertaking of any part or whole of the interest of two or more companies or
corporate bodies”. Acquisition on the
other hand involves the purchase of controlling interest in a company by
another company. It is the process of acquisition (through purchase of stock)
or control by a company in another making the other company, the subsidiary of
the acquiring company. In a nutshell, acquisition is a form of corporate
response for re-organization. Kantudu
(2005) define acquisition as a situation whereby the purchasing company ends up
controlling the purchased company.
Kurfi (2003) in his words
define acquisition as technically an act of acquiring effective control by one
company over the assets and management of another company without necessarily
combining the companies. Agbor (2003)
define acquisition as “the takeover by one company of sufficient shares in
another company to give the acquiring company control over the other company. Vanhorne (1998) define merger as “a
combination of two corporations where only one survives. The merged corporation
goes out of existence leaving its assets and liabilities to the acquiring
corporation”. The definition given by
different authors with respect to mergers or acquisition have the same meaning
but with different wordings. One can therefore conclude that merger is
technically a combination or integration of two or more existing companies with
the combined companies choosing the name of one of the companies or taking a
completely new name. If the name of one of the companies is trained, then the
other will go into liquidation. On the other hand, if a new name is taken, the
two existing companies will go into liquidation. Acquisition/takeover is a
technical way of acquiring and having total control over the assets and
liabilities of the acquired company, that is, the acquired company ceases to
exist forever and has to go into permanent liquidation, Kurfi (2003).
2.3 TYPES
OF MERGERS AND ACQUISITION
Merger and acquisition are
essentially corporate growth strategies by external means rather than internal
development of products, markets, technologies etc. In this view, according to
Kurfi (2003), merger is classified into three main types viz:
i)
Horizontal merger
ii)
Vertical merger
iii)
Conglomerate merger
i)
Horizontal merger: This is a
combination of two or more companies in the same stage of
production/distribution or area of business. Horizontal merger is also referred
to as replicative merger in that companies that are in competition with one
another would merge from a single entity to benefit from synergy, economies of
scale and exploit more benefits in the market, example, the combining of two or
more textile companies or two soft drink companies to gain better share of the
market.
ii)
Vertical merger: This is a combination of two or more companies
engaged in different stages of production or distribution to complement one
another. In this type of merger, the companies involve are not in competition
with one another, but have a seller-buyer relationship. Example, the combining
of a poultry farm with poultry feed mill, or merging a spinning company and
weaving company.
iii)
Conglomerate merger: This is a combination of companies engaged in
unrelated lines of business activity. The companies involved are not in
competition with one another nor do they have buyer-seller relationship.
Example, the merging of textile form, cement company, soft drinks company etc.
According to Hannatu (2005),
acquisition is also divided into three types and may be in the form of:
i)
Horizontal acquisition
ii)
Vertical acquisition
iii)
Conglomerate acquisition
i)
Horizontal acquisition: This is the acquisition of a firm in the same
industry as the acquiring firm or company. The companies compete with each
other in their products.
ii)
Vertical acquisition: This involves companies at different steps of the
production process. The acquisition by an airline company of travel agency
would be a vertical acquisition.
i)
Conglomerate acquisition: The acquiring company or
firm and the acquired company or firms are not related to each other.
2.4 REASONS
FOR MERGER AND ACQUISITION
The purpose of merger and
acquisition is to locate value. But motives vary and many reasons have been
proposed by theorists and financial managers as to the rationale for merger and
acquisition. Kantudu (2005), advances reasons for merger and acquisition as
follows:
i)
Reduction in operating cost: Companies as a result of the
possible elimination of duplicated functions such as management’s
administration and accounting functions.
ii)
Economic of scale as a result of the company combination of
the operation of two or more companies
Atedo (2003) also come up
with some reasons for merger and acquisition which are as follows:
i)
Increase in competitiveness and expansion of the company’s
product range.
ii)
Creation of a stronger company with increase competitive
ability and increased prospects for shareholder’s return.
iii)
Rationalization of operation of related companies in the
small industry.
iv)
Enhanced corporate development of the economy resulting from
stronger companies and industries
2.5 POSITIVE
IMPACT OF MERGER AND ACQUISITION
a)
Financial benefit of merger and acquisition
b)
Other positive impact
a)
Financial positive impact of merger and acquisition as stated
by Kurfi (2003) are:
i)
Growth opportunity: A company that may be constrained to grow
through internal development due to shortage of funds can but grow externally
by merging with another company through exchange of shares and thus eliminating
the financial constraints.
ii)
Investment opportunity: A company that does not have enough
internal opportunity to invest its surplus cash can use it to acquire some
other companies. Thus acquisition would provide investment opportunities for
shareholders surplus funds which would increase the market value of the shares.
iii)
Borrowing power: A merger of two companies with fluctuating
by negative correlated cash flows can bring stability of cash flows of the
combined company. Thus, the risk of insolvency can be reduced and the capacity
of the combined company to service a large amount of debt could be enhanced due
to the financial stability of the company therefore the borrowing capacity of
the combine company would be enhanced.
iv)
Cost effectiveness: A combined company is able to realize
economies of scale in transaction and floating cost related to an issue of
capital. The merged company makes a largest security issues and thereby achieve
effectiveness.
b)
Other positive impacts
i)
Provide better platform for more effective banking
regulations and policy realization.
ii)
Reversal of thinned
out industry manpower
iii)
Banks involved in merger and acquisition becomes more
internationally competitive especially in West Africa.
2.5.1 Negative
impact of Merger and Acquisition
The following are some of
the negative impact of merger and acquisition:
i)
Managerial ability of sufficient caliber to handle the
aggregates of men prosperities and transactions is difficult to find.
ii)
Bigness leads to extravagances, some expenditure are not
watched carefully.
iii)
Details that are important to small companies are often
overlooked in large once such details may be detrimental to any department
within the big organization.
2.5.2 Difficulties
and Success of Merger and Acquisition in Nigeria
Kantudu (2005) gave three
important points as difficulties of merger and acquisition in Nigeria which are
as follows:
i)
Resistance by Directors, labour union, employees and
shareholders of target companies.
ii)
Loss of job arising from elimination of duplicated list.
2.5.3 Success
Factors in Merger and Acquisition
Some success factors of merger
and acquisition are as follows:
i)
The support of the major shareholders of the companies
holding more than say 5% of the share is paramount.
ii)
General support of the Nigerian shareholders group in the
companies
iii)
Support of the company’s labour force
iv)
Experience and expertise of financial advisers
v)
Correct packaging and presentation of application to SEC and
the NSE to avoid unnecessary delays.
2.5.4 Other
important issues in Merger and Acquisition
The Relevant Statutes/Regulations
The statute which provides
the legal framework within which mergers and acquisitions can be carried out in
Nigeria is the Investment and Securities Act (ISA), 1999. Without going into
too much detail, the ISA (among other things) repealed the provision of the
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Decree 1988 and also repealed part
xvii of the Companies and Allied Matters Act (CAMA) 1990 (dealing in company’s
securities) which contained detailed provision relating to the public offer and
sale of securities, unit trust and mergers and takeovers. Equivalent and in
some cases more detailed provision relating to these and other matters can now
be found in ISA and in the rules and regulations issued by the Securities and
Exchange Commission (SEC), pursuant to section 258 and 262 of the ISA.
2.5.5 Steps
necessary in Mergers and Acquisition
The basic steps that a
company must take in ensuring that the merger is legally consummated are as
follows:
i)
Decision to combine by the companies involved
ii)
Fact finding assembles necessary data and product sales etc
by companies involved
iii)
Initiation identity, prospects through the board and
management
iv)
Confirmation consent of Board of Directors and shareholders
v)
Negotiation between the key officers of the companies
Apart from the above, the
legal and procedural requirements are as follows:
i)
Preparation of scheme of arrangement, and this contains the
agreed terms and conditions of the merger and acquisition
ii)
Court ordered meeting in line with CAMD, the Federal High
Court summons separate meeting of the shareholders of both companies to
consider and approve the scheme of arrangement.
iii)
Report to court the outcome of the meeting
iv)
Obtain final sanction from the court to proceed with the
merger and acquisition
v)
Filing of the court order with the Registrar of companies
vi)
Seal deals and implement terms share exchange or cash
exchange
2.5.6 Specific
Requirement for Merger and Acquisition – the Banking Sector
A cursory look at the Bank
and Other Financial Institutions Act (BOFIA) reveals that the Act is silent on
the issue of merger and acquisition. The Act does however restrict the
acquisition of share by banks and given how closely banks are regulated. It is
safe to assume that any merger or acquisition will require the prior approval
of the CBN (Kantudu, 2005).
2.5.7 Consideration
in Merger and Acquisition
Where a merger and
acquisition transaction results in the transfer of assets, liabilities and
undertaking of one company to another, the acquiring company provides a
consideration to the shareholders of the company that will lose its identity.
In Nigeria, this usually involves the issuance of securities in the surviving
company bit many also be monetary. The numbers of securities or the values of
the monetary consideration is based on the merger valuation. Shareholder who is
elected to receive monetary consideration in lieu of securities in the
surviving company are usually required to give notice to that effect in the
manner prescribed in the scheme document.
2.5.8 Remarkable
Changes in the Nigerian Banking System
The ability of the banking
industry to play its role has been periodically punctuated by its vulnerability
to systemic distress and macroeconomic volatility, making policy fine tuning
inevitable. Historically, the Nigerian banking industry had evolved in four
stages. The first stage can be best described as the unguided laissez faire
phase (1950 – 1959), during which several poorly capitalized and unsupervised
indigenous banks failed in their infancy. The second stage was the control
regime (1960 – 1985), during which the Central Bank of Nigeria ensured that
only fit and proper persons were granted banking license, subject to the
prescribed minimum paid up capital. The third stage was the post-structural
adjustment programme (SAP) or the Control regime (1986 – 2004), during which
the neo-liberal philosophy of free entry was occur-stretched and baking licenses
were dispensed by the political authorities on the basis of patronage. The
emerging fourth stage is the era of consolidation (2004 to a foreseeable future)
with major emphasis on re-capitalization and proactive regulation based on risk
based or risk focused supervision framework (U. Kama, 2006).
2.5.9 Recent
Global experiences in Mergers and Acquisition
The financial services
industry is restructuring and consolidating at an unprecedented pace around
globe, particularly in the United States, Western Europe, Africa and Asia.
Specifically, in the period 1997 – 1998, 203 banks merger and acquisitions took
place in Europe area. In 1998, a merger in France resulted in a new bank with a
capital base of US $688 billion, while the merger of two banks in Germany in
the same year created the second largest bank in Germany with a capital base of
US $541 billion. In Japan, a spectacular merger has produced the new Tokyo-Mitsubishi
Bank with over 700 billion in asset. In
many emerging market, including Argentina, Brazil and Korea, consolidation has
also become prominent as banks strive to become more competitive and resilient
to shocks as well as reposition their operation to cope with the challenges of
the increasingly globalised banking systems. Each continent expects Africa
(with possible exception of South Africa) has had a fair share of merging
banking.
In Africa where many banks
are small in size in terms of their market capitalization, mergers and
acquisitions in terms of volume and value have been relatively low. The five
largest banks in Africa – Standard Bank Group, Amalgamated Bank of South Africa
(ABAS) Ltd, Nedco Ltd, First National Bank Ltd and Investment Groups Ltd are
based in South Africa and are all the result of Mergers and consolidations.
Standard Bank Groups are the largest banking group in South Africa and Africa
as a whole and were the result of the consolidation of several financial
institutions over a period of ten years. As at end of December 2008, its
shareholder’s funds total R28,667 million or $4.6 billion. Similarly, the
amalgamated banks of South Africa Limited are the second largest in the country
and Africa as a whole with a shareholder’s fund base of R19,350 million or $3.1
billion. The bank was the result of the merger of over fifteen commercial
banks, whole banks, finance houses, insurance companies and advisory services
across South Africa, Namibia, Tanzania, Mozambique and Zimbabwe. As a result,
the bank has been able to create a powerful financial base that enables it to
provide services to selected markets in the United Kingdom and United States of
America.
In Nigeria, before the
recently reforms, the minimum capitalization for existing banks stood at $7.53
million, while new bank were required to take a minimum capitalization of
$15.06 billion, as against $526.4 million minimum capitalization in Malaysia.
The largest bank in Nigeria before the consolidation exercise had a capitalization
of 240 million, while the total capitalization of then 89 banks stood at
$3.0billion (U. Kama, 2006). According
to Mustapha 2006, the only mode of consolidation allowed are merger and
outright acquisitions/takeovers. A mere group arrangement is not acceptable for
the purpose of meeting the 25 billion naira. Therefore, all banks that has
banks as subsidiaries or have common ownership were encouragement to merger and
acquisitions. In general note, the
Nigerian Banking will (through merger and acquisition) yield veritable goldmine
of superior returns such as an unmatched array of financial solutions provided
through a sophisticated and wide branch network throughout Nigerian Banking
sector with clearly defined growth strategy and exercise that offers full spectrum
of financial products and services. It will also engender economies of scale,
saves cost, synergies and shareholders returns on a level yet unparalleled by
any other financial institutions in Africa.
2.6 HISTORICAL
BACKGROUND OF UBA PLC
Today’s United Bank for
Africa Plc is the product of the merger between former UBA and STB Plc which
was placed 3rd and 5th largest banks respectively by the
CBN as at early 2004 and also the 5% acquisition of Continental Trust Bank by
STB in 2003. The history of UBA Plc dates back to 1946 for former UBA and STB
and CTB both in 1990. Today’s UBA
emerged of a time of industry consolidation induced by regulation on the 6th of
July, 2004 by Professor Charles Soludo, former Governor of the Central Bank of
Nigeria. The consolidated UBA was borne out of a desire to lead the domestic
sector to a new era of global relevance by championing the creation of the
Nigeria Consumer Finance Market, leading a private/public sector partnership
supporting the acceleration of Nigeria’s economic development and growing the
institution from a banking to a one-stop financial services institution.
Today, the consolidated UBA
is the largest financial services institution in West Africa with a balance
sheet size in excess of N600 billion operating
in Nigeria and Ghana. UBA has 428 retail distribution centers across Nigeria,
its main operation base, and 5 branches in Ghana. Outside Africa, it also has
presence in New York and Cayman Island. UBA is presently operating more than 5
million customer accounts.
CHAPTER THREE
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
3.1 INTRODUCTION
This chapter gives an
insight to the methods used in the collection and interpretation of data used,
it also includes the methods of the analysis used.
3.2 POPULATION
OF THE STUDY
The population of this study
is the 25 banks that are now in existence after the merger and acquisition
exercise in the Nigerian Banking Industry.
3.3 SAMPLE
SIZE
The sample size of this
research study was limited to thirty (30) officers such sixteen (16) of the
officers selected were from the senior and junior staff cadre, while the
remaining fourteen (14) were from the customers. Hence, the sixteen (16) staff
chosen have adequate information needed to reach conclusion generalisable to
the whole “Assessment of the Impact of Mergers and Acquisition in the Nigerian
Banking Industry”.
3.4 SAMPLING
TECHNIQUE
Judgmental sampling
technique is a method of sampling whereby a researcher selects a sample of an
appropriate size on the basis of his judgment of his desirable. The researcher
used judgment sampling technique in selecting management staff and account of
United Bank of Africa Plc (UBA).
3.4.1 Primary
Data
The primary data consist of
first hand information collected from the respondents. For the purpose of this research,
personal interview method will be used to extract information from the
respondents. It will also be used to supplement and measure the effectiveness
and reliability of the data collected from their records and other secondary
data sources. Also, questionnaires will be used on the staff of UBA Plc and its
customers.
3.4.2 Secondary
Data
These are information
already available and originally collected previously for some other purpose
but becomes useful in the process of research such as textbooks, organization
records, publications and journals, certain documents of UBA Plc such as annual
report, business directory, journal and publications of their progress and
development will also be used.
3.4.3 Questionnaire
Method
Well constructed questions will
be used to investigate from the staff about comparison between how the bank
were then and how it is now. Customers to the bank will also be issued with
questionnaires.
3.4.4 Personal
Interview Method
Personal interview will be
carried out on the accounts and managers of UBA Plc. This is used to gather
valid and reliable information through the responses of the interviewee to a
planned sequence of questions. The interview covers issues relating to what
he/she thinks personally about the merger of the two banks and to suggest areas
that needs improvement.
3.5 METHOD
OF DATA ANALYSIS AND PRESENTATION
The method of data analysis
employed in this research involved arranging the data into tabular formats,
essentially for ease of understanding and comprehensiveness of all the
underlying relationship between the operational variables. The data obtained in
respect of each of these questions asked were collected according to these
options provided.
CHAPTER FOUR
DATA PRESENTATION AND ANALYSIS
4.0 This chapter is concerned with the
presentation and analysis of all the information/data collected. Responses from
the questionnaires are analyzed accordingly.
4.1 DATA
PRESENTATION AND ANALYSIS
4.1.1 Position/Rank of the workers in the
organization
Table 1:
RANKS |
NO. OF RESPONDENTS |
PERCENTAGE |
Accountants |
7 |
44% |
Auditors |
2 |
13% |
Management Staff |
7 |
43% |
Total |
16 |
100 |
Source: Field Survey, 2010
All the above motivated
staff, have their role to play in the organization to ensure efficient and
effective decision in relation to merger. The implication with regards to
merger is that, for the auditor’s work, the audit work will increase as a
result of the merger, so there has to be a joint audit because different
accounting forms have to come and combine resources together to audit the
accountants of the said merged banks. On the part of Accountants, the
accounting work is likely to increase as a result of the merger, there has to
be a paper book records of accounting so as to come up with a good financial
statement as a result of the merger. Lastly, because of the increase in the
number of management staff as result of the merger, most staff have to be
selected so as to minimize running cost.
4.1.2:
How long have you work in the
organization?
Table 2:
PERIOD |
NO. OF RESPONDENTS |
PERCENTAGE |
1 – 3years |
5 |
31% |
4 – 10years |
6 |
38% |
11 year – above |
5 |
31% |
Total |
16 |
100 |
Source: Field Survey, 2010
Here, the implication under
these category is that, not all the management staff witness merger, as such
they cannot give reliable information on the effectiveness of merger and
acquisition, while some of the management staff witnesses merger and can give
detailed information on the effectiveness of the banks before and after the
merger.
4.1.3 What responsibility did you offer in the organization?
Table 3:
RESPONSES |
NO. OF RESPONDENTS |
PERCENTAGE |
Accountants |
7 |
44% |
Auditors |
2 |
38% |
Management Staff |
7 |
43% |
Total |
16 |
100 |
Source: Field Survey, 2010
Implications of accountants
here is two (2) different bank accounts has to be properly maintained as a
result of the merger, the expenses will increase, and customers will also
increase so as the accountant work has to be effective and efficient.
On the part of auditors,
with regard to merger, the auditors should exercise some reasonable care, skill
and caution, while discharging their work, they should approach their work with
integrity without any suspicion or dishonesty.
4.1.4 Did you witness the merger between former
UBA Plc and STB Plc?
Table 4:
RESPONSES |
NO. OF RESPONDENTS |
PERCENTAGE |
Yes |
11 |
69% |
No |
5 |
31% |
Total |
16 |
100 |
Source: Field Survey, 2010
On this part, the table
above implication shows that some of the management staff does not witness
merger, as such they cannot give any information on the assessment of impact of
merger and acquisition in the banking industry.
4.1.5 Are you affected by this merger and
acquisition?
Table 5:
RESPONSES |
NO. OF RESPONDENTS |
PERCENTAGE |
Yes |
9 |
56% |
No |
7 |
44% |
Total |
16 |
100 |
Source: Field Survey, 2010
From the table above, the
implication is, some of the staff were affected as a result of the merger,
because some staff lost their job, some were transferred, some were promoted
and at the same time demoted, their work has increased, there is a lot of
tension and stress, while some are not affected, the issue of merger and
acquisition has brought them success, as such they can render good services.
4.1.6 How have the inflows of customers have been,
after the merger?
Table 6:
RESPONSES |
NO. OF RESPONDENTS |
PERCENTAGE |
Decreasing |
- |
- |
Unchanged |
- |
- |
Increasing |
16 |
100% |
Total |
16 |
100 |
Source: Field Survey, 2010
100% of the respondents
argued that the inflows of customers have increased after the merger, this is
said to be so, but in real life situation, most customers when seeing their
banks are merging usually close their account so as to avoid the problem of
bank distress.
4.1.7 Which of the following do you consider UBA’s
major problem?
Table 7:
RESPONSES |
NO. OF RESPONDENTS |
PERCENTAGE |
Higher management |
2 |
12.5% |
Employees |
2 |
12.5% |
The Organization |
4 |
25% |
Product/Services |
- |
- |
Competitors |
8 |
50% |
Total |
16 |
100 |
Source: Field Survey, 2010
Higher management: The
implication on their part is that, they cannot come out with new customer
services to compete with others, this is because as result of their inability
to give good management decisions.
Secondly employees, most of
the employees are not adequately well remunerated and motivated as such they
cannot render good services.
Thirdly competitors, most
staff argued that UBA cannot compete with other banks because of so many
factors, but customer service and that should be a better way to compete with
others.
Lastly the organization, the
organization has to come up with good investment decision to achieve its
objective in a desirable way.
4.1.8 How can these problems be eradicated or
minimized?
Table 8:
RESPONSES |
NO. OF RESPONDENTS |
PERCENTAGE |
Efficient service |
8 |
50% |
Neighborhood banking |
2 |
12.5% |
Better remuneration |
6 |
37.5% |
Total |
16 |
100 |
Source: Field Survey, 2010
From the table above, the
implication is that before these problems can be eradicated or minimized,
several control measures has to be taken into cognizance such as efficient
service, good remuneration, more branches, corporate social responsibilities
and so on.
The following questionnaires were administered to the
customers of UBA Plc
4.1.9 Table 9, 10 and 11, there is no implication
on this part, because the data obtained from them can enable the researcher to
come up with reasonable conclusion.
4.1.12 what are the major problems of UBA Plc?
Table 12:
RESPONSES |
NO. OF RESPONDENTS |
PERCENTAGE |
Competition |
- |
- |
Employees |
- |
- |
Service/Products |
- |
- |
Delay |
4 |
29% |
Congestion |
10 |
71% |
Over-documentation |
- |
- |
Total |
14 |
100 |
Source: Field Survey, 2010
Most customers see delay and
congestion as the major problems of the bank. The table above implications
shows that, the bank is likely to lose customers not to make huge profit as
result of the congestion put stress on their staff, as they will work even
during their ideal time and lastly they cannot meet their financial obligations
when they fall due.
4.1.13 how can these problems be eradicated or
minimized?
Table 13:
RESPONSES |
NO. OF RESPONDENTS |
PERCENTAGE |
Efficient service |
9 |
64% |
Neighborhood banking |
5 |
36% |
Total |
14 |
100 |
Source: Field Survey, 2010
The implications of the
table above shows that their network has to be improved and effective to
facilitate easy banking, enough branches has to be opened, the use of Automated
Teller Machines (ATM) has to be effective to avoid problem of delay.
4.1.14 is there any suitable solutions that you think
necessarily to be taken to avoid the problem of insolvency?
Table 14:
RESPONSES |
NO. OF RESPONDENTS |
PERCENTAGE |
Proper management |
11 |
79% |
Loans given |
3 |
21% |
Total |
14 |
100 |
Source: Field Survey, 2010
The implication of the table
above is that, 79% of the respondents urged that better management in the bank
will contribute, while 21% of the respondents believed that when given out
loans, it has to be proper and collaterals must be valued accordingly.
4.2 TEST
OF HYPOTHESIS
HO: Mergers and Acquisition have no impact on the performance
of the banking sector. From our analysis
it was not discovered that the merger had no impact on the bank under
study. Therefore this hypothesis does
not hold.
H1: Mergers and Acquisition have an impact on the performance
of the banking sector. This hypothesis
can be tested with table 4.1.6 which shows that the merger has had positive
impact on UBA. All the respondents
agreed that the customers of the bank has increased drastically. The alternative hypothesis therefore, holds.
CHAPTER FIVE
SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION
5.1 INTRODUCTION
Contained in this chapter is
a digest of the research result, conclusion was then drawn from the summary
with a view to making recommendation.
5.2 SUMMARY
The present economic
environment in Nigeria more than ever before, calls for the effective and
efficient utilization of both human and material resources to achieve the
desired goals of an enterprise. To this end, various strategies are being
employed to meet these challenges of which mergers and acquisition is one of
them. This study was therefore conducted to assess the impact of mergers and
acquisition in the Nigerian banking industry.
Attempt was made to highlight the significance of mergers and
acquisition to the utilization, stakeholders and the economy as a whole. The
concepts of mergers and acquisition, its purpose, benefits, types, the
regulatory and professional pronouncement have been discussed. From the analysis of related literature,
analysis and interpretation of data, the researcher conclude that mergers and
acquisition are really catalyst for enhanced control, rapid growth and survival
of both strong and ailing firms in Nigeria. The researcher also wishes to
submit that financial institutions adopt fast to mergers and acquisitions than
non-financial institutions.
5.3 CONCLUSION
(FINDINGS)
Based on my own findings, I
hereby conclude that mergers and acquisition became the only option available
to banks who could not meet the minimum capital base of N25 billion imposed by the Central Bank of Nigeria. Mergers and
acquisition has its share of problems but if systematically and carefully done,
like the case of UBA Plc, the advantage usually outweighs the disadvantage.
The role of the Securities
and Exchange Commission (SEC) and other regulatory bodies should not be such
that will frustrate or discharge firms from participating in mergers and
acquisition exercise, that in the parties should of be free to negotiate the
terms and condition including the price and timing of the proposed mergers and
acquisition. It is further concluded
that the Nigerian Enterprises Promotion Decree should be amended to facilitate
mergers and acquisition activities in the country by providing avenue for
attracting new foreign investment.
The type of bank
services/products provided by a bank has a serious impact on attraction of
customers to that organization. For example, customers are now attracted to
patronize ‘cash fast’ and the ATM, more than the old product/service that the
bank had. Due to the recapitalization of the banking sector, customers feel
very safe depositing their valuables with the bank unlike what was obtainable
before that. Prior to the recapitalization, about 15 banks have been liquidated
by the CBN and a dozen declared distressed, the whole customers in the banking
industry became very cautious as to where they make their deposit. This was
therefore corrected by the recapitalization police. UBA Plc can be said to be
among the leaders in the banking sector housing a total deposit base of about N570 billion, a profit before tax of about
N15 billion and a retail branch of 428
nationwide. Having one of the highest capital at its disposal, the prospects of
UBA Plc are numerous due to the response capitalization exercise.
5.4 RECOMMENDATION
Based on the findings of
this study and the conclusions drawn from them, the researcher will like to
make the following recommendations. It is hoped that these recommendations will
be useful to bankers in helping them to improve in their means of satisfying
customers, the problems encountered during and after merger and the types.
Also, students and all other parties might also find this study beneficial.
1)
Competition is high in the banking industry, therefore any
bank that does not plan on how to satisfy customers and maintain them will soon
be forced out of business by others, like the likes of UBA Plc.
2)
Long turnaround times is nothing but a trap that can render a
strong organization weak and even death, due to obsolescence which will make it
unattractive due to change in customer taste. An organization should therefore
reduce as much as possible, its turn-around maintenance to re-create energy and
attractiveness.
3)
The banking industry should try to increase their branch
network, because there are places and towns that have no single branch of their
organization in which people are willing to save.
4)
Customer ignorance on some issues, policy, and knowledge,
bank activities is very low. An atmosphere should be created where a staff can
be employed to take care of customer who wants to know about a particular
operation or any person that is confused. The organization should also provide
documents on weekly or monthly basis to any customer entering the organization
at a particular day to inform them of recent happenings.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Agbor, D. (2003), Understanding the Legal and Regulatory
Framework for executing Mergers and Acquisition in Nigeria. Proceedings
of a Seminar on Mergers and Acquisition organized by SEC.
Kantudu & Hannatu (2005, “Mergers and Acquisition as tool for
Achieving Corporate Growth and Control: A Theoretical Approval” Bayero
International Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. No. 2.
Kurfi, A. K. (2003), Principles of Financial Management.
Benchmark Ltd, Kano.
Peter, N. A. (2003) “Merger and Acquisition: The Nigerian Banking
Industry to meet the Development Challenges of the 21st Century”.
Being an Address delivered to the special meeting of the Bankers Committee held
on July 6, 2004 at the CBN Headquarters, Abuja.
Vanhorne, J. C. (1988), Financial Management and Policy Practice.
Hall International Inc. Eaglewood, N. J. USA, 9th edition.
QUESTIONNAIRE
Dear Sir/Madam,
I am a research student from
Kano State Polytechnic, School of Management Studies, Department of
Accountancy. This questionnaire has questions concerning the topic “An
Assessment of the Impact of Mergers and Acquisition in the Nigerian Banking
Industry, A Case Study of United Bank for Africa Plc (UBA)”. Please tick or
answer the questions to the best of your knowledge and sincerely. Be assured
that all information given will be treated with the strictest confidence.
Thanks.
EMPLOYERS
1)
What is your position/rank in the organizations? ……………………….
2)
How long have you worked with this organization? ……………………
3)
What responsibility do you offer in the organization?
………………….
4)
Is the organization’s activities suitable for you?
Yes No
No idea
5)
If yes, how did you contribute to the success and progress of
the organization?…………………………………………………………….
…………………………………………………………………………...
6)
Did you witness the merger between former Standard Trust Plc
(STB) and United Bank for Africa Plc (UBA)?
Yes No
7)
Are you affected by this merger and acquisition? Yes No
8)
How have the inflows of customers here been after the merger?
a) Decreasing (b)
Unchanged (c)
Increasing
9)
Which of the following do you consider UBA’s major problem?
a)
Higher management
b)
Employees
c)
The organization
d)
Product/Service
e)
Competitors
10)
How can these problems be eradicated or minimized?
…………………………………………………………………….........
…………………………………………………………………….........
…………………………………………………………………….........
…………………………………………………………………….........
إرسال تعليق